Stop Wasting Time at Pipeline Reviews

Introduction

You've been told pipeline reviews are critical. Someone wrote an article. You read it. Now you think you have to do them.

But most pipeline reviews are performative theater. Status updates masquerading as strategy sessions. Two hours of your life you'll never get back.

Here's what actually matters: inspecting your top deals and figuring out how to close them faster.

This guide shows you how to turn pipeline reviews from boring data slogs into deal acceleration sessions. You'll learn how to structure them so reps come prepared, meetings stay focused, and deals actually move forward.

---

What's Broken: The Ritual No One Enjoys

The Line-by-Line Death March

You pull all your reps together. You start at the top of the pipeline and go deal by deal.

"Is there a close plan? Is there a champion? What's the next step?"

Surface-level questions. Tactical stuff. And because salespeople are salespeople, they get into the weeds. They ask follow-up questions. The rep goes on defense.

They're defending their stage weighting. Justifying why the deal is "still on track." Explaining why it's at this stage and not that stage.

Before you know it, 45 minutes have gone by. You're three deals deep on the first rep. There's no time left. You speed through the rest or just run out of time and never finish.

Salespeople on Defense Mode

The entire dynamic is wrong.

Reps aren't asking for help. They're defending their forecast. They're peacocking. They're trying to look good instead of actually solving problems.

No one's getting help. Nothing's moving forward. It's just status updates with extra steps.

No Structure, No Focus

Most leaders don't know how to structure these things. So they just wing it.

"Let's look at all deals over Stage 3."

You're looking at data IN the meeting that should've been reviewed beforehand. The meeting design doesn't support deep discussion. You can't get into anything meaningful because you're trying to cover too much.

You're reviewing data, not advancing deals.

The Real Cost

Time wasted: Status updates everyone could've read async in 10 minutes.

Missed opportunities: Deals that could've moved forward with the right help, but no one asked for it.

Bad habits: Reps learn to avoid asking for help because the meeting is about defending, not collaborating.

Stalled deals: While you're busy "reviewing," deals sit there not closing.

---

The Better Way: Deal Memos + Focused Sessions

Shift the Paradigm

Pipeline reviews shouldn't be about inspecting ALL deals.

They should be about advancing your highest priority deals.

The meeting isn't for status. It's for strategy and leverage. It's where the team figures out: How do we actually close this thing?

---

Step 1: Reps Prepare Deal Memos (Before the Meeting)

Each Rep Identifies Their Top 5-10 Deals

Not every deal. Just the highest priority ones.

What makes a deal "high priority" depends on you:

• Largest deals
• Most strategic accounts
• Closest to close
• Taking up the most mental space
• Whatever criteria matters to YOUR business

Put your own flavor on it. The point is: focus on what matters.

Write a Deal Memo for Each Deal

One page max. No more.

This forces strategic thinking before the meeting. It gets the "data review" out of the way. And it makes it crystal clear where the rep needs help.

Here's the template:

---

Deal Memo Template

Deal: [Company Name - Deal Size - Expected Close Date]

Quick Summary (2-3 sentences)

• What's the situation?
• Who's involved?
• Where are we in the process?

What could put this at risk?

• Be honest: budget concerns, competing priorities, missing stakeholders, technical blockers, etc.
• List everything that could derail this deal

Your plan to mitigate the risk

• What are YOU doing to address these risks?
• Critical: These must be actions within your control or direct influence
• Not "the customer will figure out budget" - that's outside your control
• Instead: "I'm scheduling a call with their CFO to walk through ROI and help them build the business case"

Your call

• Deal size: $X
• Close date: [Date]
• Confidence level: High / Medium / Low

Help needed to advance this deal

• What can the team or leadership do to help?
• Be specific: CEO outreach to their executive team, technical resource for architecture review, reference call from similar customer, executive sponsor meeting, custom content from marketing, etc.

---

Common Mistakes When Writing Deal Memos

Mistake #1: Risks outside your control, mitigation outside your control

Bad: "Risk: They might not have budget. Mitigation: Hope they find budget."

Good: "Risk: Budget uncertainty. Mitigation: I'm setting up a call with their finance team to build an ROI model together and identify budget sources."

Mistake #2: Vague asks for help

Bad: "Help needed: Just general support."

Good: "Help needed: Can our CEO do a 15-minute call with their CTO to address technical concerns about our architecture?"

Mistake #3: Not being honest about risks

If you're worried the deal might slip, say it. If there's a competitor in the mix, say it. If you haven't talked to the economic buyer yet, say it.

The point of this exercise is to get help, not to look good.

---

Step 2: Run the Actual Meeting Differently

Before the Meeting

Everyone reads the deal memos async. Come prepared with ideas to help.

You're not showing up cold. You've already reviewed the situation. The meeting is for problem-solving, not information gathering.

During the Meeting

Skip the data review. You already read it.

Focus on one question per deal: "How do we accelerate this?"

Spend 5-10 minutes per deal. Go deep on the deals that matter.

Tactical discussion:

• Can we leverage the CEO for an executive call?
• Do we have a reference in their industry?
• Should we bring in a technical resource?
• Can marketing create custom content for this account?
• Who knows someone at that company?
• What's blocking this and how do we unblock it?

The meeting becomes:

• Strategic: How do we win this?
• Action-oriented: Who's doing what by when?
• Collaborative: The team helps instead of interrogates

If Someone Didn't Prepare a Memo

Skip their deals. Move to the next person.

This sounds harsh, but it's the only way to reinforce that preparation matters. If you let people show up unprepared and still get time, you're training everyone that the memos are optional.

They're not optional. No memo = no discussion.

How to Keep It from Devolving Back

Set a timer. 5-10 minutes per deal, then move on.

Cut off defense mode. If a rep starts defending their forecast instead of asking for help, redirect: "I'm not questioning your judgment. I'm asking: what can we do to help you close this faster?"

Break it up if needed. If you have a large sales org, don't try to do everyone in one meeting. Break it out:

• By territory
• By rep (1:1 or small groups)
• By deal type (new business vs. expansion)
• However your org is structured

Adapt to what works. The principle stays the same: focused, prepared, action-oriented.

---

Frequency: As Often as Necessary

Start with weekly. Your first one will be the worst one. You'll figure out how to make it better.

As you get better at pipeline hygiene and forecasting, you might need these less frequently. But assume weekly at first.

The Retro: Every Fourth Meeting

Every fourth pipeline review should be a pure retrospective. No deal discussions. Just:

Start doing: What should we add to make this better?

Stop doing: What's a drag on the meeting?

Continue doing: What's working well?

This comes from the software development world. It's a feedback and change function built into the meeting itself.

The retro might reveal:

• Process improvements
• Things to stop doing that waste time
• Changes to meeting structure
• Different people who should be involved

Give the team agency to improve their own meeting. They'll make it better than you could alone.

---

What Changes

For Reps

Before: Show up to meeting, defend their forecast, leave without help.

After: Think strategically before the meeting, get actual help moving deals forward, collaborate instead of defend.

For Leaders

Before: Spend two hours on status updates, leave frustrated nothing moved.

After: Spend time on deals that matter, actually advance deals, see exactly where reps need help and provide it.

For the Team

Before: Meetings are performative, nothing happens afterward, deals stall.

After: Meetings are productive, clear actions come out of every session, deals move faster.

---

The Result: Pipeline Reviews That Actually Work

What You've Built

• A process that advances deals, not just reviews them
• Strategic thinking from reps before the meeting
• Clear asks for help (and clear ways leadership can contribute)
• Meetings people actually want to attend
• A feedback loop (the retro) that keeps improving the process

What You've Avoided

• The 2-hour slog through every deal
• Surface-level questions that don't move anything forward
• Reps defending instead of strategizing
• Time wasted on theater instead of closing

The Uncomfortable Truth

Your first pipeline review with this approach will feel weird. Reps won't be used to it. You'll have to enforce the "no memo = no discussion" rule.

Do it anyway.

After 3-4 weeks, it becomes the norm. Reps start thinking more strategically. They ask for help proactively. Deals actually move.

And that's the whole point.